29 Jun
29Jun

First, give yourself three minutes to read this article:


The idea of using electric cars as a primary mode of transportation has gained significant traction in recent years. Proponents argue that electric vehicles (EVs) offer a range of benefits that make them a superior alternative to traditional gasoline-powered cars. There are several compelling reasons to support the adoption of electric cars.

Firstly, electric cars are environmentally friendly. Unlike gasoline-powered cars, EVs produce zero tailpipe emissions, which significantly reduces air pollution and greenhouse gas emissions. This is crucial in the fight against climate change and in improving air quality in urban areas. Additionally, the use of renewable energy sources to charge electric vehicles further enhances their environmental benefits.

Secondly, electric cars are cost-effective in the long run. Although the initial purchase price of an EV may be higher than that of a traditional car, the overall cost of ownership is lower. EVs have fewer moving parts, which means less maintenance and lower repair costs. Moreover, the cost of electricity is generally cheaper than gasoline, resulting in substantial savings on fuel expenses over time.

Furthermore, electric cars offer a smooth and quiet driving experience. The electric motor provides instant torque, resulting in rapid acceleration and a more responsive driving experience. The absence of engine noise makes for a quieter and more comfortable ride, enhancing the overall driving experience.



Next, listen to the following lecture:

 



You have twenty minutes to answer the following question. You can refer to the article as you write your essay. You may not listen to the lecture again.


Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they oppose specific points made in the reading passage












Sample Answer: 


The reading and the lecture both discuss the advantages and challenges of electric cars. While the author of the article highlights the benefits of EVs, the lecturer provides counterarguments that challenge these claims.

Firstly, the author argues that electric cars are environmentally friendly, producing zero tailpipe emissions and helping to combat climate change. However, the lecturer points out that the production of EV batteries is environmentally damaging, involving resource-intensive mining processes. Additionally, if the electricity used to charge EVs comes from non-renewable sources, the overall environmental benefits are diminished.

Secondly, the article suggests that electric cars are cost-effective in the long run due to lower maintenance costs and cheaper fuel expenses. In contrast, the lecturer argues that the high initial purchase price of EVs can be a significant barrier for consumers. Furthermore, the resale value of electric cars is uncertain, which can offset the potential long-term savings.

Lastly, the author claims that electric cars offer a smooth and quiet driving experience, enhancing overall comfort. The lecturer, however, raises concerns about the underdeveloped charging infrastructure, which can lead to range anxiety for drivers. Additionally, long charging times compared to quick refueling of gasoline cars present practical limitations, particularly for long-distance travel.

In conclusion, while the article presents a positive view of the benefits of electric cars, the lecture provides a more nuanced perspective, highlighting the challenges and potential drawbacks. Both perspectives underscore the importance of considering various factors when evaluating the viability of electric cars as a primary mode of transportation.



הערות
* כתובת הדואר האלקטרוני לא תוצג באתר.